8:30-12:00/13:00-18:30
400-668-2606
拍卖号：x1129875024
结束时间：12/24/2025 07:07:35
日本邮费：卖家承担
可否退货：不可
个 数：1
提前结束：可
最高出价：
1、【自动延长】：如果在结束前5分钟内有人出价，为了让其他竞拍者有时间思考，结束时间可延长5分钟。
2、【提前结束】：卖家觉得达到了心理价位，即使未到结束时间，也可以提前结束。
3、参考翻译由网络自动提供，仅供参考，不保证翻译内容的正确性。如有不明，请咨询客服。
4、本站为日拍、代拍平台，商品的品质和卖家的信誉需要您自己判断。请谨慎出价，竞价成功后订单将不能取消。
5、违反中国法律、无法邮寄的商品(注：象牙是违禁品，受《濒临绝种野生动植物国际贸易公约》保护)，本站不予代购。
6、邮政国际包裹禁运的危险品，邮政渠道不能发送到日本境外（详情请点击）, 如需发送到日本境外请自行联系渠道。
Back in1954, a paper[2] by Bondi and Gold was to pick upona much olderqu- tion and raise anew one that would trigger another longdebate. The old question hadbeenaroundsince the beginning of the twentiethcentury, whenBorn?rstraised it[1] and others followed suit. This was the question of whethera uniformly acc- erated charge (in?at spacetime) would radiateelectromagnetic energy. The new question arose from the claim by Bondi and Gold that (inthe contextof general relativity now)a static charge ina static gravitational ?eld cannot radiateenergy. If this were the case, thenaparticular version of the equivalence principle would thereby be contradicted. This book reviews the problem discovered by Bondi and Gold and discusses the ensuingdebate ascarried on by Fulton and Rohrlich [3], DeWitt and Brehme [4], Mould [5], Boulware [6], andParrott [7].Various solutionshave been proposed by the above (and otherswhoare not discussed here). One of the aims here will be to putforward arather different solution to Bondi and Gold's radiation problem. So eventhough the paperscited are discussed to a large extent in chronological order, the reason for writing this is not justto produce an historical reference. Andeven though the version of general relativity applied hereis entirely consensual, every one of these papersis criticised on at leastoneimportant count, soI suspectthat the resultas a whole should not be described asconsensual.
| 出价者 | 信用 | 价格 | 时间 |
客服微信1
客服微信2
客服微信2
投诉微信
扫描关注 公众号最新动态
mercari代购
;){kind=link}